I want the funky chicken.
Age 37, Male
Student
some boring ass school
New York,NY
Joined on 8/29/02
- Level:
- 60
- Exp Points:
- 81,254 / 100,000
- Exp Rank:
- 19
- Vote Power:
- 10.07 votes
- Rank:
- Sup. Commander
- Global Rank:
- 34
- Blams:
- 21,934
- Saves:
- 109,992
- B/P Bonus:
- 60%
- Whistle:
- Deity
- Medals:
- 8,938
- Supporter:
- 1y 11m 30d
VicariousE
I kinda groaned when I hit "They're the sportwriters...", but only because that's what you've been on about lately (justifiably so). Question is this: What are the resumes of these brain deficient voters/writers? Were they turn of the century sports bloggers who got picked up cheap? That might explain their cognitive aloofness.... wonder how many of them are on NG right now, voting 5 ad infinitum, and making scurrilous arguments in the BBS?
Idiot-Finder (Updated )
Some of those idiots used the All-Decade as a justification of choosing Sapp over Strahan because he was on the team twice. That leaving out the fact that in the 1990s, DE were dominated by some of the all time greats such as Reggie White and Bruce Smith, then you have Doleman and Neil Smith playing their prime years during the decade. Strahan had tougher competition to deal with than Sapp on his position in which the DT that features Cortez Kennedy and John Randle.
Sapp made the 1990s team on second team that also features Bryant Young who was a good player but far from among the "greats" which tells you much about the competition. Sapp should make the HOF, but not over Strahan.
Neil Smith was even a better player in his position than Bryant Young in his.
With that said, the voters can burn in hell for all I care.
I will get over it eventually, right now, not yet.
Also, don't get me started when they screwed Bill Parcells over last year, what the fuck is this bullshit? Are they pissed that they lost money betting on the Bills? Then again I wouldn't put it past those assfucks.